UDC

612.821+612.8+159.91+159.99

Authors

Nataliya I. Khorseva*/**, Yuriy G. Grigor’ev***, Pavel E. Grigor’ev****/*****
*Emanuel Institute of Biochemical Physics, Russian Academy of Sciences (Moscow, Russian Federation)
**Space Research Institute, Russian Academy of Sciences (Moscow, Russian Federation)
***Burnazyan Federal Medical and Biophysical Centre (Moscow, Russian Federation)
****V.I. Vernadsky Crimean Federal University (Simferopol, Russian Federation)
*****Tyumen State University (Tyumen, Russian Federation)

Abstract

Part 1 of the review analysed works studying the influence of low-intensity electromagnetic fields of natural (cosmophysical factors) and technogenic (mobile phone radiation) origin on the antenatal development of humans and animals. The present article consists of two sections. Section 1 studies whether postnatal development could be determined by the effect of cosmophysical factors during the intrauterine (antenatal) development; it also considers the possibility of using a retrospective analysis of cosmophysical factors affecting an organism during its intrauterine development to predict various nosological forms of diseases and abnormalities in the postnatal development in the light of the theory of heliogeophysical imprinting. Section 2 presents data on the possible late effects of chronic exposure to mobile phone radiation on an organism during its intrauterine development and provides the results of both experimental and epidemiological studies. The fundamental difference in the nature of the biotropic effect of these factors is underlined. Space weather, as an integral factor of human habitat on a global scale, undergoes cyclic and quasi-periodic changes (at the level of decades, years, months, weeks, and days), while exposure to mobile phone radiation is an uncontrollable and constantly operating factor with a pronounced accumulative effect. Our main task was to systematize the key lines of research in this area without providing a detailed analysis of the impact mechanisms of these environmental factors, since such a task requires separate consideration. The majority of the analysed works look into possible impact mechanisms, in particular those produced by electromagnetic radiation of mobile phones.

Keywords

low-intensity electromagnetic fields, cosmophysical factors, solar and geomagnetic activity, heliogeophysical imprinting, mobile phone radiation, postnatal development

References

1. Vladimirskiy B.M., Sidyakin V.G., Temur’yants N.A., Makeev B.V., Samokhvalov V.P. Kosmos i biologicheskie ritmy [Space and Biological Rhythms]. Simferopol, 1995. 206 p. 
2. Nikityuk B.A., Alpatov A.M. Svyaz’ vekovykh izmeneniy protsessa rosta i razvitiya cheloveka s tsiklami solnechnoy aktivnosti [Relationship Between Secular Variations in the Process of Human Growth and Development and the Cycles of Solar Activity]. Voprosy antropologii, 1979, no. 63, pp. 34–44. 
3. Trukhina S.I., Tsirkin V.I., Trukhin A.N. Massa tela pri rozhdenii kak prediktor uspeshnosti obucheniya [Birth Weight as a Predictor of Academic Performance]. Vestnik Severnogo (Arkticheskogo) federal’nogo universiteta. Ser.: Mediko-biologicheskie nauki, 2013, no. 3, pp. 89–94. 
4. Kaygorodova N.Z. Polovye osobennosti vliyaniya solnechnoy aktivnosti na umstvennuyu rabotosposobnost’ pervoklassnikov [Sexual Features of Influence of Solar Activity on Intellectual Working Capacity of First-Graders]. Vestnik Tomskogo gosudarstvennogo pedagogicheskogo universiteta, 2009, no. 8, pp. 135–137. 
5. Khorseva N.I. Vozmozhnost’ ispol’zovaniya psikhofiziologicheskikh pokazateley dlya otsenki vliyaniya kosmofizicheskikh faktorov (obzor) [Possibility of Using the Psychophysiogical Indices for the Evaluation of the Influence of Cosmophysical Factors (Review)]. Geofizicheskie protsessy i biosfera, 2013, vol. 12, no. 2, pp. 34–56. 
6. Vinogradov E.S. Izmenenie chastoty rozhdeniya odarennykh lyudey v raznykh fazakh 11-letnego solnechnogo tsikla za 1100 let [Changes in the Frequency of Birth of Gifted People in Various Phases of the 11-Year Solar Cycle over 1100 Years]. Available at: http://alexnn.trinitas.pro/files/2013/01/e.s.-vinogradov-izmenenie-chastotyi-rozhdeniyodarennyih- lyudey-v-raznyih-fazah.doc (accessed 15 June 2017). 
7. Vasilik P.V. Sistemnyy analiz vliyaniya magnitnogo polya Zemli na rost i razvitie cheloveka [System Analysis of the Influence of the Earth’s Magnetic Field on Human Growth and Development]. Kibernetika i vychislitel’naya tekhnika, 1979, no. 45, pp. 12–20. 
8. Temur’yants N.A., Vladimirskiy B.M., Tishkin O.G. Sverkhnizkochastotnye elektromagnitnye signaly v biologicheskom mire [Ultra-low-Frequency Electromagnetic Signals in the Biological World]. Kiev, 1992. 187 p. 
9. Vladimirskiy B.M., Temur’yants N.A. Vliyanie solnechnoy aktivnosti na biosferu – noosferu [Influence of Solar Activity on the Biosphere – Noosphere]. Moscow, 2000. 374 p. 
10. Petrichuk S.I., Shishchenko V.M., Dukhova Z.N., Gaytinova A.A., Nartsissov R.P., Sizov I.P. Vliyanie estestvennykh fizicheskikh faktorov vneshney sredy na sostoyanie beremennykh zhenshchin s fiziologicheskim techeniem beremennosti [Influence of Natural Physical Factors of the Environment on the State of Pregnant Women with Physiological Pregnancy]. Biofizika, 1998, vol. 43, no. 5, pp. 853–856. 
11. Krikunova N.I., Nazarenko L.P., Leonov V.P., Minaycheva L.I., Chernykh V.G. Uroven’ vrozhdennykh porokov razvitiya v tomskoy populyatsii i deystvie geliogeofizicheskogo faktora [Inherent Developmental Defects Level in the Tomsk Population and Influence of Heliophysical Factor]. Available at: http://www.biometrica.tomsk.ru/lib/cm_sun.htm (accessed 6 June 2017). 
12. Khorseva N.I., Zenchenko T.A. Sravnenie individual’no-tipologicheskikh osobennostey lyudey, rozhdennykh v raznye gody 21-23 tsiklov solnechnoy aktivnosti [Comparison of Individual and Typological Characteristics of People Born in Different Years of 21–23 Cycles of Solar Activity]. Tezisy dokladov VI Mezhdunarodnoy krymskoy konferentsii “Kosmos i biosfera” [Proc. 6th Int. Crimean Conf. “Space and the Biosphere”]. Partenit, 2005, p. 76. 
13. Kaznacheev V.P., Mikhaylova L.P. Bioinformatsionnaya funktsiya estestvennykh elektromagnitnykh poley [Bioinformation Function of Natural Electromagnetic Fields]. Novosibirsk, 1985. 181 p. 
14. Deryapa N.R., Khasnulin V.I., Nikolaev V.N. Itogi issledovaniy gelioklimatologii cheloveka po programme “Globeks-80” [Results of Research on Human Helioclimatology Within the Globeks-80 Programme]. Problemy solnechno-biosfernykh svyazey [Problems of Solar-Biospheric Relationships]. Novosibirsk, 1982, pp. 40–49. 
15. Khorseva N.I. Ekologicheskoe znachenie estestvennykh elektromagnitnykh poley v period vnutriutrobnogo razvitiya cheloveka [Ecological Significance of Natural Electromagnetic Fields During Human Prenatal Development]. Moscow, 2004. 144 p. 
16. Kozlov V.A., Kozlova A.K., Neznakova A.Z., Naledakov B.N. Vliyanie solnechnoy aktivnosti na izmenenie nekotorykh somatometricheskikh i fiziologicheskikh pokazateley v protsesse akseleratsii [Influence of Solar Activity on the Changes in Some Somatometric and Physiological Parameters in the Process of Acceleration]. Fiziko-matematicheskie i biologicheskie problemy deystviya elektromagnitnykh poley i ionizatsii vozdukha [Physico-Mathematical and Biological Aspects of the Action of Electromagnetic Fields and Air Ionization]. Moscow, 1975. Vol. 2, pp. 67–70. 
17. Bos G.J. Possible Relationship Between Sunspot Cycles and Fluctuations in Frequency of Mongolism. J. Interdiscip. Cycle Res., 1972, vol. 3, no. 2-3, pp. 267–268. 
18. Nartsissov R.P., Ozhegov A.M., Ryneyskaya V.A. Techenie bolezni Verl’gofa u detey v usloviyakh spokoynogo i aktivnogo Solntsa [The Course of Werlhof’s Disease in Children Under the Conditions of Quiet and Active Sun]. Pediatriya, 1981, no. 5, pp. 29–31. 
19. Vayserman A.M., Koshel N.M., Belaja I.I., Voitenko V.P. Influence of Solar Activity in Pre- and Postnatal Stages of Development on Human Longevity. Tezisy dokladov Mezhdunarodnogo krymskogo seminara “Kosmos i biosfera. Fizicheskie polya v biologii, meditsine i ekologii” [Proc. Int. Crimean Semin. “Space and the Biosphere. Physical Fields in Biology, Medicine and Ecology”]. Partenit, 2001, pp. 58–59. 
20. Mikhaylov R.E., Belisheva N.K., Novosel’tsev R.G., Cherney S.D., Vinogradov A.N. Zavisimost’ prodolzhitel’nosti zhizni patsientov psikhonevrologicheskogo internata ot urovnya solnechnoy aktivnosti v god svoego rozhdeniya [Dependence of Life Expectancy at Patients of Psychoneurological Internat on Level of Solar Activity in a Year of the Birth]. Izvestiya Samarskogo nauchnogo tsentra RAN, 2011, vol. 13, no. 1, pp. 1905–1909. 
21. Volchek O.D., Pavlov K.I. Sopryazhennost’ pokazateley sensomotoriki s prirodnymi usloviyami mesyatsev zachatiya i rozhdeniya [Correlations Between Sensorimotor Indices and Environment Conditions in the Months of Conception and Birth]. Uchenye zapiski SPbGMU im. akad. I.P. Pavlova, 2011, vol. 18, no. 3, pp. 63–64. 
22. Volchek O.D. Funktsional’naya asimmetriya mozga i usloviya sredy obitaniya rannego embriogeneza i ontogeneza [Functional Brain Asymmetry and Environmental Conditions During Early Embryogenesis and Ontogenesis]. Uchenye zapiski SPbGMU im. akad. I.P. Pavlova, 2013, vol. 20, no. 2, pp. 28–31. 
23. Iskhakov V.P. K voprosu o vozmozhnoy svyazi mezhdu shizofreniey i solnechnoy aktivnost’yu [On a Possible Link Between Schizophrenia and Solar Activity]. Zhivye sistemy i geliogeofizicheskie faktory [Living Systems and Heliogeophysical Factors]. Moscow, 1976, pp. 13–16. 
24. Kornetov A.N., Samokhvalov V.P., Kornetov N.A. Ritmologicheskie i ekologicheskie issledovaniya pri psikhicheskikh zabolevaniyakh [Rhythmological and Ecological Studies in Mental Illness]. Kiev, 1988. 204 p. 
25. Voropaeva Ya.V., Chibisov S.M., Meladze Z.A, Khodorovich N.A., Kharlitskaya E.V. Vliyanie kosmicheskoy pogody na vnutriutrobnoe formirovanie vilochkovoy zhelezy [Influence of Space Weather on Pre-Natal Formation of Thymus Gland]. Mezhdunarodnyy zhurnal prikladnykh i fundamental’nykh issledovaniy, 2015, no. 6-1, pp. 65–67. 
26. Trofimov A.V. Prenatal’nyy gelioimprinting. Novye tekhnologii profilakticheskoy meditsiny [Prenatal Helioimprinting. New Preventive Technologies]. Palmarium Academic Publishing, 2012. 344 p. 
27. Trofimov A.V. Novosibirskaya shkola geliobiologii v estafete “russkogo kosmizma” [Novosibirsk School of Heliobiology Picking up the Baton of Russian Cosmism]. Available at: http://www.isrica.ru/index. php?Itemid=4&id=8&option=com_content&view=article (accessed 15 June 2017). 
28. Khorseva N.I., Konradov A.A. Individual’no-retrospektivnyy analiz geliogeofizicheskoy obstanovki v period vnutriutrobnogo razvitiya cheloveka [Individual Retrospective Analysis of the Heliogeophysical Situation During Human Intrauterine Development]. Tezisy II Mezhdunarodnoy konferentsii “Chelovek i elektromagnitnye polya” [Proc. 2nd Int. Conf. “Human and Electromagnetic Fields”]. Sarov, 2007, p. 57. 
29. Grigor’ev P.E. Psikhicheskie zabolevaniya i variatsii znaka mezhplanetnogo magnitnogo polya v embriogeneze cheloveka [Mental Diseases and Variations of the Sign of the Interplanetary Magnetic Field in Human Embryogenesis]. Uchenye zapiski Tavricheskogo natsional’nogo universiteta im. V.I. Vernadskogo. Ser.: Biologiya, khimiya, 2003, vol. 16, no. 1, pp. 35–40. 
30. Grigor’ev P.E. Geliogeofizicheskie faktory riska vozniknoveniya porokov razvitiya nervnoy trubki [Heliogeophysical Risk Factors of Development of Neural Tube Defects]. Aviakosmicheskaya i ekologicheskaya meditsina, 2008, vol. 42, no. 4, pp. 63–65. 
31. Grigor’ev P.E., Vayserman A.M., Mekhova L.V., Bolgov M.Yu., Bezrukov O.F. Geomagnitnaya aktivnost’ kak faktor riska raka shchitovidnoy zhelezy (gipotezy, raschety, obosnovanie) [Geomagnetic Activity as Risk Factor of Thyroid Cancer (Hypotheses, Estimation, Substantiation)]. Onkologiya, 2010, vol. 12, no. 2, pp. 118–121. 
32. Kaznacheev V.P., Deryapa N.R., Khasnulin V.I., Trofimov A.V. O fenomene geliogeofizicheskogo imprintirovaniya i ego znachenii v formirovanii tipov adaptivnykh reaktsiy cheloveka [On the Phenomenon of Heliogeophysical Imprinting and Its Role in the Formation of Various Adaptive Responses in Humans]. Byulleten’ Sibirskogo otdeleniya AMN SSSR, 1985, no. 5, pp. 3–7. 
33. McFarland D. Animal Behaviour: Psychology, Ethology and Evolution. FT Prentice Hall, 1985 (Russ. ed.: Mak- Farlend D. Povedenie zhivotnykh. Psikhobiologiya, etologiya i evolyutsiya. Moscow, 1988. 520 p.). 
34. Bateson P. How Do Sensitive Periods Arise and What Are They for? Anim. Behav., 1979, vol. 27, pt. 2, pp. 470–486. 
35. Crouse H.V. The Nature of the Influence of X-Translocations on Sex of Progeny in Sciara Coprophila. Chromosoma, 1960, vol. 11, no. 1, pp. 146–166. 
36. Shinin V.V., Zorin S.A. Rol’ genomnogo imprintinga i metilirovaniya DNK v nasledstvennoy patologii cheloveka [The Role of Genomic Imprinting and DNA Methylation in Human Hereditary Pathology]. Meditsinskiy nauchnyy i uchebno-metodicheskiy zhurnal, 2001, no. 4, pp. 101–103. 
37. Bartolomei M.S., Tilghman S.M. Genomic Imprinting in Mammals. Annu. Rev. Genet., 1997, vol. 31, pp. 493–525. 
38. Surani M.A., Kothary R., Allen N.D., Singh P.B., Fundele R., Ferguson-Smith A.C., Barton S.C. Genome Imprinting and Development in the Mouse. Dev. Suppl., 1990, pp. 89–98. 
39. Isaev D.A., Platonov E.S., Konyukhov B.V. Raspredelenie partenogeneticheskikh klonov epidermal’nykh melanoblastov u khimernykh myshey C57BL/6(PG)↔BALB/c [Distribution of Parthenogenetic Clones of Epidermal Melanoblasts in Chimeric C57BL/6 (PG) ↔BALB/c Mice]. Ontogenez, 1997, vol. 28, no. 4, pp. 306–313. 
40. Konyukhov B.V., Malinina N.A., Sazhina M.V. Ekspressiya mutantnogo gena mi u myshi: pattern beloy pyatnistosti [Expression of the Mutant Mi Gene in Mice: White Spotting Pattern]. Genetika, 1996, vol. 32, no. 11, pp. 1521–1527. 
41. Kavet R. EMF and Current Cancer Concepts. Bioelectromagnetics, 1996, vol. 17, no. 5, pp. 339–357. 
42. Tennenbaum J. Russian Scientists Replicate ‘Impossible’ Mitogenetic Radiation. 21st Century Science & Technology, winter 2000–2001, vol. 13, no. 4, pp. 60–63. 
43. Brindak O.I., Pozyvaylo S.M., Shendrik I.V., Gradyushko A.A. Gormonal’nyy imprinting i ego znachenie v fiziologii i patologii endokrinnoy sistemy [Hormonal Imprinting and Its Significance in the Physiology and Pathology of the Endocrine System]. Uspekhi fiziologicheskikh nauk, 1992, vol. 23, no. 3, pp. 78–84. 
44. Grigor’ev Yu.G. Vliyanie elektromagnitnogo polya sotovogo telefona na kurinye embriony (k otsenke opasnosti po kriteriyu smertnosti) [Biological Effects of Mobile Phone Electromagnetic Field on Chicken Embryos (Risk Assessment Using the Mortality Rate)]. Radiatsionnaya biologiya. Radioekologiya, 2003, vol. 43, no. 5, pp. 541–543. 
45. Zareen N., Khan M.Y., Minhas L.A. Dose Related Shifts in the Developmental Progress of Chick Embryos Exposed to Mobile Phone Induced Electromagnetic Fields. J. Ayub. Med. Coll. Abbottabad., 2009, vol. 21, no. 1, pp. 130–134. 
46. Yakimenko I.L., Khenshel’ D., Sidorik E.P., Tsybulin A.S., Rozumnyuk V.T. Vliyanie elektromagnitnogo izlucheniya mobil’nogo telefona na somitogenez ptitsy [Effect of Electromagnetic Radiation of Cell Phone on Bird Somitogenesis]. Dopovidi Natsіonal’noї akademії nauk Ukraїni, 2011, no. 1, pp. 146–152. 
47. Bedir R., Tumkaya L., Şehitoğlu İ., Kalkan Y., Yilmaz A., Şahin O.Z. The Effect of Exposure of Rats During Prenatal Period to Radiation Spreading from Mobile Phones on Renal Development. Ren. Fail., 2015, vol. 37, no. 2, pp. 305–309. 
48. Odacı E., Ünal D., Mercantepe T., Topal Z., Hancı H., Türedi S., Erol H.S., Mungan S., Kaya H., Çolakoğlu S. Pathological Effects of Prenatal Exposure to a 900 MHz Electromagnetic Field on the 21-Day-Old Male Rat Kidney. Biotech. Histochem., 2015, vol. 90, no. 2, pp. 93–101. 
49. Çetin H., Nazıroğlu M., Çelik Ö., Yüksel M., Pastacı N., Özkaya M.O. Liver Antioxidant Stores Protect the Brain from Electromagnetic Radiation (900 and 1800 MHz)-Induced Oxidative Stress in Rats During Pregnancy and the Development of Offspring. J. Matern. Fetal Neonatal Med., 2014, vol. 27, no. 18, pp. 1915–1921. 
50. Türedi S., Hancı H., Topal Z., Ünal D., Mercantepe T., Bozkurt İ., Kaya H., Odacı E. The Effects of Prenatal Exposure to a 900-MHz Electromagnetic Field on the 21-Day-Old Male Rat. Electromagn. Biol. Med., 2015, vol. 34, no. 4, pp. 390–397. 
51. Ye W., Wang F., Zhang W., Fang N., Zhao W., Wang J. Effect of Mobile Phone Radiation on Cardiovascular Development of Chick Embryo. Anat. Histol. Embryol., 2016, vol. 45, no. 3, pp. 197–208. 
52. Kaplan S., Deniz O.G., Önger M.E., Türkmen A.P., Yurt K.K., Aydın I., Altunkaynak B.Z., Davis D. Electromagnetic Field and Brain Development. J. Chem. Neuroanat., 2016, vol. 75, pt. B, pp. 52–61. 
53. Aldad T.S., Gan G., Gao X.B., Taylor H.S. Fetal Radiofrequency Radiation Exposure from 800–1900 mh z- Rated Cellular Telephones Affects Neurodevelopment and Behavior in Mice. Sci. Rep., 2012, no. 2, pp. 312. 
54. Bas O., Odaci E., Mollaoglu H., Ucok K., Kaplan S. Chronic Prenatal Exposure to the 900 megahertz Electromagnetic Field Induces Pyramidal Cell Loss in the Hippocampus of Newborn Rats. Toxicol. Ind. Health, 2009, vol. 25, no. 6, pp. 377–384. 
55. Ingole I.V., Ghosh S.K. Effect of Exposure to Radio Frequency Radiation Emitted by Cell Phone on the Developing Dorsal Root Ganglion of Chick Embryo: A Light Microscopic Study. Nepal Med. Coll. J., 2012, vol. 14, no. 4, pp. 337–341. 
56. Chen C., Ma Q., Liu C., Liu C., Deng P., Zhu G., Zhang L., He M., Lu Y., Duan W., Pei L., Li M., Yu Z., Zhou Z. Exposure to 1800 MHz Radiofrequency Radiation Impairs Neurite Outgrowth of Embryonic Neural Stem Cells. Sci. Rep., 2014, no. 4. Art. no. 5103. 
57. Haghani M., Shabani M., Moazzami K. Maternal Mobile Phone Exposure Adversely Affects the Electrophysiological Properties of Purkinje Neurons in Rat Offspring. Neuroscience, 2013, vol. 250, pp. 588–598. 
58. Fragopoulou A.F., Koussoulakos S.L., Margaritis L.H. Cranial and Postcranial Skeletal Variations Induced in Mouse Embryos by Mobile Phone Radiation. Pathophysiology, 2010, vol. 17, no. 3, pp. 169–177. 
59. Gul A., Celebi H., Uğraş S. The Effects of Microwave Emitted by Cellular Phones on Ovarian Follicles in Rats. Arch. Gynecol. Obstet., 2009, vol. 280, no. 5, pp. 729–733. 
60. Sehitoglu I., Tumkaya L., Kalkan Y., Bedir R., Cure M.C., Zorba O.U., Cure E., Yuce S. Biochemical and Histopathological Effects on the Rat Testis After Exposure to Electromagnetic Field During Fetal Period. Arch. Esp. Urol., 2015, vol. 68, no. 6, pp. 562–568. 
61. Tsybulin O., Sidorik E., Brieieva O., Buchynska L., Kyrylenko S., Henshel D., Yakymenko I. GSM 900 MHz Cellular Phone Radiation Can Either Stimulate or Depress Early Embryogenesis in Japanese Quails Depending on the Duration of Exposure. Int. J. Radiat. Biol., 2013, vol. 89, no. 9, pp. 756–763. 
62. Vereshchako G.G., Chueshova N.V., Gorokh G.A., Naumov A.D. Sostoyanie reproduktivnoy sistemy kryssamtsov pervogo pokoleniya, poluchennykh ot obluchennykh roditeley i podvergnutykh vozdeystviyu EMI (897 MGts) v period embriogeneza i postnatal’nogo razvitiya [State of the Reproductive System in Male Rats of 1st Generation Obtained from Irradiated Parents and Exposed to Electromagnetic Radiation (897 MHz) During Embryogenesis and Postnatal Development]. Radiatsionnaya biologiya. Radioekologiya, 2014, vol. 54, no. 2, pp. 186–192. 
63. Zarei S., Mortazavi S.M.J., Mehdizadeh A.R., Jalalipour M., Borzou S., Taeb S., Haghani M., Mortazavi S.A., Shojaei-Fard M.B., Nematollahi S., Alighanbari N., Jarideh S. A Challenging Issue in the Etiology of Speech Problems: The Effect of Maternal Exposure to Electromagnetic Fields on Speech Problems in the Offspring. J. Biomed. Phys. Eng., 2015, vol. 5, no. 3, pp. 151–154. 
64. Guxens M., van Eijsden M., Vermeulen R., Loomans E., Vrijkotte T.G., Komhout H., van Strien R.T., Huss A. Maternal Cell Phone and Cordless Phone Use During Pregnancy and Behaviour Problems in 5-Year-Old Children. J. Epidemiol. Community Health, 2013, vol. 67, no. 5, pp. 432–438. 
65. Divan H.A., Kheifets L., Obel C., Olsen J. Prenatal and Postnatal Exposure to Cell Phone Use and Behavioral Problems in Children. Epidemiology, 2008, vol. 19, no. 4, pp. 523–529. 
66. Rezk A.Y., Abdulqawi K., Mustafa R.M., Abo El-Azm T.M., Al-Inany H. Fetal and Neonatal Responses Following Maternal Exposure to Mobile Phones. Saudi Med. J., 2008, vol. 29, no. 2, pp. 218–223. 
67. Su X.J., Yuan W., Tan H., Liu X.Y., Li D., Li D.K., Huang G.Y., Zhang L.W., Miao M.H. Correlation Between Exposure to Magnetic Fields and Embryonic Development in the First Trimester. PLoS One, 2014, vol. 9, no. 6, pp. e101050. 
68. Vrijheid M., Martinez D., Forns J., Guxens M., Julvez J., Ferrer M., Sunyer J. Prenatal Exposure to Cell Phone Use and Neurodevelopment at 14 Months. Epidemiology, 2010, vol. 21, no. 2, pp. 259–262. 
69. Grigor’ev Yu.G., Grigor’ev O.A. Sotovaya svyaz’ i zdorov’e. Elektromagnitnaya obstanovka. Radiobiologicheskie i gigienicheskie problemy. Prognoz opasnosti [Cellular Communication and Health. Electromagnetic Environment. Radiobiology and Hygiene Problems. Forecast of Danger]. Moscow, 2016. 573 p.