UDC

[612.821+612.45]:316.47

DOI

10.37482/2687-1491-Z036

Authors

Elena P. Murtazina* ORCID: 0000-0002-4243-8727
Irina S. Matyul’ko* ORCID:0000-0001-9105-3172
Boris V. Zhuravlev* ORCID: 0000-0002-6954-6891
*P.K. Anokhin Research Institute of Normal Physiology (Moscow, Russian Federation)
Corresponding author: Elena Murtazina, address: ul. Baltiyskaya 8, Moscow, 125315, Russian Federation; e-mail: e.murtazina@nphys.ru

Abstract

This article provides a review of the literature data on the association between personal characteristics belonging to the behavioural dominance system and various psychophysiological, hormonal, and neurobiological indices. Social and behavioural features characteristic of dominance and subordination are described. The review discusses the studies showing the relationship between the indices of dominant or subordinate behaviours and adaptive capacity as well as levels of trait and state anxiety of individuals in different social contexts. Further, the key hormonal mechanisms underlying social dominance are reviewed. The dual-hormone hypothesis of dominance regulation under social stress is illustrated through studies showing the correlation between the changes in adrenocortical and sex hormone levels and their joint effect on the regulation of hierarchical status. Individual characteristics of prevalence or balance between the behavioural activation (motivation of gaining reward) and inhibition (motivation of avoiding failure) systems were found to play a crucial role in achieving higher dominance and the formation of ideas about one’s own social status. In addition, the neurophysiological and neurochemical mechanisms involved in the regulation of social hierarchical relationships are discussed. The review describes the features of brain activation during social interaction, including dominance and subordination, as well as context-dependent perception of one’s own social status and that of the opponent. The behavioural dominance system is proposed to be considered in the framework of the theory of functional systems, its architectonics, and central principles (interaction between its components, afferent synthesis, decision making, action program, and action result acceptor). Based on the systemic principles, social factors can be viewed as major environmental and triggering stimuli which affect the afferent synthesis, modulate the action program, and change the appraisal of results achieved by individuals during social interactions.

Keywords

dominance behavioural system, social relationships, stress, anxiety, adrenocortical hormones, sex hormones, speed of decision making, neurobiological markers

References

1. van der Kooij M.A., Sandi C. The Genetics of Social Hierarchies. Curr. Opin. Behav. Sci., 2015, vol. 2, pp. 52–57.
2. Knebel J.-F., Murray M.M. Towards a Resolution of Conflicting Models of Illusory Contour Processing in Humans. Neuroimage, 2012, vol. 59, no. 3, pp. 2808–2817.
3. Ellyson S.L., Dovidio J.F. Power, Dominance, and Nonverbal Behavior: Basic Concepts and Issues. Ellyson S.L., Dovidio J.F. (eds.). Power, Dominance, and Nonverbal Behavior. New York, 1985, pp. 1–27.
4. Zuroff D.C., Fournier M.A., Patall E.A., Leybman M.J. Steps Toward an Evolutionary Personality Psychology: Individual Differences in the Social Rank Domain. Can. Psychol., 2010, vol. 51, no. 1, pp. 58–66.
5. Bugental D.B. Acquisition of the Algorithms of Social Life: A Domain-Based Approach. Psychol. Bull., 2000, vol. 126, no. 2, pp. 187–219.
6. Shaver P.R., Segev M.A., Mikulincer M. A Behavioral Systems Perspective on Power and Aggression. Shaver P.R., Mikulincer M. (eds.). Human Aggression and Violence: Causes, Manifestations, and Consequences. Washington, DC, 2011, рр. 71–87.
7. Archer J., Webb I.A. The Relation Between Scores on the Buss–Perry Aggression Questionnaire and Aggressive Acts, Impulsiveness, Competitiveness, Dominance, and Sexual Jealousy. Aggress. Behav., 2006, vol. 32, no. 5, pp. 464–473.
8. Fournier M.A., Moskowitz D.S., Zuroff D.C. Social Rank Strategies in Hierarchical Relationships. J. Pers. Soc. Psychol., 2002, vol. 83, no. 2, pp. 425–433.
9. Hall J.A., Coats E.J., LeBeau L.S. Nonverbal Behavior and the Vertical Dimension of Social Relations: A Meta-Analysis. Psychol. Bull., 2005, vol. 131, no. 6, pp. 898–924.
10. Schmid M.M. Dominance as Expressed and Inferred Through Speaking Time. Hum. Commun. Res., 2002, vol. 28, no. 3, pp. 420–450.
11. Ferguson N. Simultaneous Speech, Interruptions and Dominance. Br. J. Soc. Clin. Psychol., 1977, vol. 16, no. 4, pp. 295–302.
12. Johnson S.L., Leedom L.J., Muhtadie L. The Dominance Behavioral System and Psychopathology: Evidence from Self-Report, Observational, and Biological Studies. Psychol. Bull., 2012, vol. 138, no. 4, pp. 692–743.
13. Maner J.K., Case C.R. Dominance and Prestige: Dual Strategies for Navigating Social Hierarchies. Olson J.M., Zanna M.P. (eds.). Advances in Experimental Social Psychology. Vol. 54. Cambridge, 2016, pp. 129–180.
14. Wiggins J.S. A Psychological Taxonomy of Trait-Descriptive Terms: The Interpersonal Domain. J. Pers. Soc. Psychol., 1979, vol. 37, no. 3, pp. 395–412.
15. Buss D.M., Craik K.H. The Frequency Concept of Disposition: Dominance and Prototypically Dominant Acts. J. Pers., 1980, vol. 48, no. 3, pp. 379–392.
16. Anderson C., Kilduff G.J. Why Do Dominant Personalities Attain Influence in Face-to-Face Groups? The Competence-Signaling Effects of Trait Dominance. J. Pers. Soc. Psychol., 2009, vol. 96, no. 2, pp. 491–503.
17. Guinote A. How Power Affects People: Activating, Wanting, and Goal Seeking. Annu. Rev. Psychol., 2017, vol. 68, pp. 353–381.
18. Judge T.A., Bono J.E., Ilies R., Gerhardt M.W. Personality and Leadership: A Qualitative and Quantitative Review. J. Appl. Psychol., 2002, vol. 87, no. 4, pp. 765–780.
19. Jackson D.N. Personality Research Form Manual. NewYork, 1974.
20. Bateman T.S., Crant J.M. The Proactive Component of Organizational Behavior: A Measure and Correlates. J. Organ. Behav., 1993, vol. 14, no. 2, pp. 103–118.
21. Hollis F., van der Kooij M.A., Zanoletti O., Lozano L., Cantó C., Sandi C. Mitochondrial Function in the Brain Links Anxiety with Social Subordination. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA, 2015, vol. 112, no. 50, pp. 15486–15491.
22. Larrieu T., Cherix A., Duque A., Rodrigues J., Lei H., Gruetter R., Sandi C. Hierarchical Status Predicts Behavioral Vulnerability and Nucleus Accumbens Metabolic Profile Following Chronic Social Defeat Stress. Curr. Biol., 2017, vol. 27, no. 14, pp. 2202–2210.
23. Goette L., Bendahan S., Thoresen J., Hollis F., Sandi C. Stress Pulls Us Apart: Anxiety Leads to Differences in Competitive Confidence Under Stress. Psychoneuroendocrinology, 2015, vol. 54, pp. 115–123.
24. Stanton S.J. The Role of Testosterone and Estrogen in Consumer Behavior and Social & Economic Decision Making: A Review. Horm. Behav., 2017, vol. 92, pp. 155–163.
25. Inoue Y., Takahashi T., Burriss R.P., Arai S., Hasegawa T., Yamagishi T., Kiyonari T. Testosterone Promotes Either Dominance or Submissiveness in the Ultimatum Game Depending on Players’ Social Rank. Sci. Rep., 2017, vol. 7, no. 1. Art. no. 5335.
26. Carré J.M., Geniole S.N., Ortiz T.L., Bird B.M., Videto A., Bonin P.L. Exogenous Testosterone Rapidly Increases Aggressive Behavior in Dominant and Impulsive Men. Biol. Psychiatry, 2017, vol. 82, no. 4, pp. 249–256.
27. Grant V.J., France J.T. Dominance and Testosterone in Women. Biol. Psychol., 2001, vol. 58, no. 1, pp. 41–47.
28. Mehta P.H., Josephs R.A. Testosterone and Cortisol Jointly Regulate Dominance: Evidence for a Dual-Hormone Hypothesis. Horm. Behav., 2010, vol. 58, no. 5, pp. 898–906.
29. Turan B., Tackett J.L., Lechtreck M.T., Browning W.R. Coordination of the Cortisol and Testosterone Responses: A Dual Axis Approach to Understanding the Response to Social Status Threats. Psychoneuroendocrinology, 2015, vol. 62, pp. 59–68.
30. Grebe N.M., Del Giudice M., Emery Thompson M., Nickels N., Ponzi D., Zilioli S., Maestripieri D., Gangestad S.W. Testosterone, Cortisol, and Status-Striving Personality Features: A Review and Empirical Evaluation of the Dual Hormone Hypothesis. Horm. Behav., 2019, vol. 109, pp. 25–37.
31. Tackett J.L., Reardon K.W., Herzhoff K., Page-Gould E., Harden K.P., Josephs R.A. Estradiol and Cortisol Interactions in Youth Externalizing Psychopathology. Psychoneuroendocrinology, 2015, vol. 55, pp. 146–153.
32. Kaldewaij R., Koch S.B.J., Zhang W., Hashemi M.M., Klumpers F., Roelofs K. High Endogenous Testosterone Levels Are Associated with Diminished Neural Emotional Control in Aggressive Police Recruits. Psychol. Sci., 2019, vol. 30, no. 8, pp. 1161–1173.
33. Helgeson V.S., Fritz H.L. Unmitigated Agency and Unmitigated Communion: Distinctions from Agency and Communion. J. Res. Pers., 1999, vol. 33, no. 2, pp. 131–158.
34. Dykiert D., Der G., Starr J.M., Deary I.J. Sex Differences in Reaction Time Mean and Intraindividual Variability Across the Life Span. Dev. Psychol., 2012, vol. 48, no. 5, pp. 1262–1276.
35. Re D.E., Lefevre C.E., DeBruine L.M., Jones B.C., Perrett D.I. Impressions of Dominance Are Made Relative to Others in the Visual Environment. Evol. Psychol., 2014, vol. 12, no. 1, pp. 251–263.
36. Gonzalez-Santoyo I., Wheatley J.R., Welling L.L.M., Cárdenas R.A., Jimenez-Trejo F., Dawood K., Puts D.A. The Face of Female Dominance: Women with Dominant Faces Have Lower Cortisol. Horm. Behav., 2015, vol. 71, pp. 16–21.
37. Santamaría-García H., Pannunzi M., Ayneto A., Deco G., Sebastián-Gallés N. ‘If You Are Good, I Get Better’: The Role of Social Hierarchy in Perceptual Decision-Making. Soc. Cogn. Affect. Neurosci., 2014, vol. 9, no. 10, pp. 1489–1497.
38. Santamaría-García H., Burgaleta M., Sebastián-Gallés N. Neuroanatomical Markers of Social Hierarchy Recognition in Humans: A Combined ERP/MRI Study. J. Neurosci., 2015, vol. 35, no. 30, pp. 10843–10850.
39. Balconi M., Vanutelli M.E. Competition in the Brain. The Contribution of EEG and fNIRS Modulation and Personality Effects in Social Ranking. Front. Psychol., 2016, vol. 7. Art. no. 1587.
40. Van Vugt M., Hogan R., Kaiser R.B. Leadership, Followership, and Evolution: Some Lessons from the Past. Am. Psychol., 2008, vol. 63, no. 3, pp. 182–196.
41. Rands S.A., Cowlishaw G., Pettifor R.A., Rowcliffe J.M., Johnstone R.A. The Emergence of Leaders and Followers in Foraging Pairs When the Qualities of Individuals Differ. BMC Evol. Biol., 2008, vol. 8. Art. no. 51.
42. King A.J., Cowlishaw G. Leaders, Followers and Group Decision-Making. Commun. Integr. Biol., 2009, vol. 2, no. 2, pp. 147–150.
43. da Cruz J., Rodrigues J., Thoresen J.C., Chicherov V., Figueiredo P., Herzog M.H., Sandi C. Dominant Men Are Faster in Decision-Making Situations and Exhibit a Distinct Neural Signal for Promptness. Cereb. Cortex, 2018, vol. 28, no. 10, pp. 3740–3751.
44. Zink C.F., Tong Y., Chen Q., Bassett D.S., Stein J.L., Meyer-Lindenberg A. Know Your Place: Neural Processing of Social Hierarchy in Humans. Neuron, 2008, vol. 58, no. 2, pp. 273–283.
45. Carver C.S., White T.L. Behavioral Inhibition, Behavioral Activation and Affective Responses to Impending Reward and Punishment: The BIS/BAS Scales. J. Pers. Soc. Psychol., 1994, vol. 67, no. 2, pp. 319–333.
46. Gray J.A. Framework for a Taxonomy of Psychiatric Disorder. Van Goozen S.H.M., Van De Poll N.E., Sergeant J.A. (eds.). Emotions: Essays on Emotion Theory. Hillsdale, 1994, pp. 29–59.
47. Gable S.L., Reis H.T., Elliot A.J. Behavioral Activation and Inhibition in Everyday Life. J. Pers. Soc. Psychol., 2000, vol. 78, no. 6, pp. 1135–1149.
48. Marsh A.A., Blair K.S., Jones M.M., Soliman N., Blair R.J. Dominance and Submission: The Ventrolateral Prefrontal Cortex and Responses to Status Cues. J. Cogn. Neurosci., 2009, vol. 21, no. 4, pp. 713–724.
49. Farrow T.F.D., Jones S.C., Kaylor-Hughes C.J., Wilkinson I.D., Woodruff P.W.R., Hunter M.D., Spence S.A. Higher or Lower? The Functional Anatomy of Perceived Allocentric Social Hierarchies. Neuroimage, 2001, vol. 57, no. 4, pp. 1552–1560.
50. Demaree H.A., Robinson J.L., Everhart D.E., Youngstrom E.A. Behavioral Inhibition System (BIS) Strength and Trait Dominance Are Associated with Affective Response and Perspective Taking When Viewing Dyadic Interactions. Int. J. Neurosci., 2005, vol. 115, no. 11, pp. 1579–1593.
51. Balconi M., Pagani S. Personality Correlates (BAS-BIS), Self-Perception of Social Ranking, and Cortical (Alpha Frequency Band) Modulation in Peer-Group Comparison. Physiol. Behav., 2014, vol. 133, pp. 207–215.
52. Balconi M., Pagani S. Social Hierarchies and Emotions: Cortical Prefrontal Activity, Facial Feedback (EMG), and Cognitive Performance in a Dynamic Interaction. Soc. Neurosci., 2015, vol. 10, no. 2, pp. 166–178.
53. Lozano-Montes L., Astori S., Abad S., Guillot de Suduiraut I., Sandi C., Zalachoras I. Latency to Reward Predicts Social Dominance in Rats: A Causal Role for the Dopaminergic Mesolimbic System. Front. Behav. Neurosci., 2019, vol. 13. Art. no. 69.
54. Alcaro A., Huber R., Panksepp J. Behavioral Functions of the Mesolimbic Dopaminergic System: An Affective Neuroethological Perspective. Brain Res. Rev., 2007, vol. 56, no. 2, pp. 283–321.
55. Arias-Carrión O., Stamelou M., Murillo-Rodríguez E., Menéndez-González M., Pöppel E. Dopaminergic Reward System: A Short Integrative Review. Int. Arch. Med., 2010, vol. 3. Art. no. 24.
56. Luciana M., Wahlstrom D., Porter J.N., Collins P.F. Dopaminergic Modulation of Incentive Motivation in Adolescence: Age-Related Changes in Signaling, Individual Differences, and Implications for the Development of Self-Regulation. Dev. Psychol., 2012, vol. 48, no. 3, pp. 844–861.
57. Ichinose T., Tanimoto H., Yamagata N. Behavioral Modulation by Spontaneous Activity of Dopamine Neurons. Front. Syst. Neurosci., 2017, vol. 11. Art. no. 88.
58. Boekhoudt L., Wijbrans E.C., Man J.H.K., Luijendijk M.C.M., de Jong J.W., van der Plasse G., Vanderschuren L.J.M.J., Adan R.A.H. Enhancing Excitability of Dopamine Neurons Promotes Motivational Behaviour Through Increased Action Initiation. Eur. Neuropsychopharmacol., 2018, vol. 28, no. 1, pp. 171–184.
59. Adamantidis A.R., Tsai H.-C., Boutrel B., Zhang F., Stuber G.D., Budygin E.A., Touriño C., Bonci A., Deisseroth K., de Lecea L. Optogenetic Interrogation of Dopaminergic Modulation of the Multiple Phases of Reward-Seeking Behavior. J. Neurosci., 2011, vol. 31, no. 30, pp. 10829–10835.
60. Gunaydin L.A., Grosenick L., Finkelstein J.C., Kauvar I.V., Fenno L.E., Adhikari A., Lammel S., Mirzabekov J.J., Airan R.D., Zalocusky K.A., Tye K.M., Anikeeva P., Malenka R.C., Deisseroth K. Natural Neural Projection Dynamics Underlying Social Behavior. Cell, 2014, vol. 157, no. 7, pp. 1535–1551. DOI: 10.1016/j.cell.2014.05.017
61. Martinez D., Orlowska D., Narendran R., Slifstein M., Liu F., Kumar D., Broft A., Van Heertum R., Kleber H.D. Dopamine Type 2/3 Receptor Availability in the Striatum and Social Status in Human Volunteers. Biol. Psychiatry, 2010, vol. 67, no. 3, pp. 275–278.
62. Miller-Butterworth C.M., Kaplan J.R., Shaffer J., Devlin B., Manuck S.B., Ferrell R.E. Sequence Variation in the Primate Dopamine Transporter Gene and Its Relationship to Social Dominance. Mol. Biol. Evol., 2008, vol. 25, no. 1, pp. 18–28. DOI: 10.1093/molbev/msm219
63. Nader M.A., Nader S.H., Czoty P.W., Riddick N.V., Gage H.D., Gould R.W., Blaylock B.L., Kaplan J.R., Garg P.K., Davies H.M., Morton D., Garg S., Reboussin B.A. Social Dominance in Female Monkeys: Dopamine Receptor Function and Cocaine Reinforcement. Biol. Psychiatry, 2012, vol. 72, no. 5, pp. 414–421.
64. Kaplan J.R., Manuck S.B., Fontenot M.B., Mann J.J. Central Nervous System Monoamine Correlates of Social Dominance in Cynomolgus Monkeys (Macaca fascicularis). Neuropsychopharmacology, 2002, vol. 26, no. 4, pp. 431–443.
65. van der Kooij M.A., Hollis F., Lozano L., Zalachoras I., Abad S., Zanoletti O., Grosse J., Guillot de Suduiraut I., Canto C., Sandi C. Diazepam Actions in the VTA Enhance Social Dominance and Mitochondrial Function in the Nucleus Accumbens by Activation of Dopamine D1 Receptors. Mol. Psychiatry, 2018, vol. 23, no. 3, pp. 569–578.
66. Chiao J.Y., Adams R.B., Tse P.U., Lowenthal L., Richeson J.A., Ambady N. Knowing Who’s Boss: fMRI and ERP Investigations of Social Dominance Perception. Group Process Intergroup Relat., 2008, vol. 11, no. 2, pp. 201–214. DOI: 10.1177/1368430207088038
67. Aminoff E., Gronau N., Bar M. The Parahippocampal Cortex Mediates Spatial and Nonspatial Associations. Cereb. Cortex, 2007, vol. 17, no. 7, pp. 1493–1503.
68. Lieberman M.D., Straccia M.A., Meyer M.L., Du M., Tan K.M. Social, Self, (Situational), and Affective Processes in Medial Prefrontal Cortex (MPFC): Causal, Multivariate, and Reverse Inference Evidence. Neurosci. Biobehav. Rev., 2019, vol. 99, pp. 311–328.
69. Hiser J., Koenigs M. The Multifaceted Role of the Ventromedial Prefrontal Cortex in Emotion, Decision Making, Social Cognition, and Psychopathology. Biol. Psychiatry, 2018, vol. 83, no. 8, pp. 638–647.
70. Murtazina E.P. Vzaimosvyazi kharakteristik sistemy povedencheskogo dominirovaniya i psikhopatologicheskikh sostoyaniy cheloveka [Relationship Between Characteristics of the Dominance Behavioral System and Human Psychopathology]. Sovremennye problemy nauki i obrazovaniya, 2018, no. 6. DOI: 10.17513/spno.28328
71. Anokhin P.K. Uzlovye voprosy teorii funktsional’noy sistemy [Central Issues of the Theory of Functional Systems]. Moscow, 1980. 196 p.